Smaller does not mean worse: variation of roe deer antlers from two distant populations in their mechanical and structural properties and mineral profile
View/ Open
Date
2020Author
Cappelli, Jamil
Ceacero, Francisco
Landete Castillejos, Tomás
Gallego, Laureano
García Díaz, Andrés José
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Antler size, structure, composition and mechanics have been shown to reflect nutri tion, climate and body effects in red deer, but studies have only assessed effects on
size in the roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Roe deer show little sexual dimorphism,
lower inter-male fighting and could form groups during part of the year but does not
form harems, in contrast to red deer. Thus, it is interesting to assess how nutrition
and habitat affects investment in antlers as compared to red deer. Antlers were col lected from adult males of two game estates differing in location, climate and man agement: 13 from the south-east of Spain (mild winter, hot summer, dry habitat and
rich supplementary feeding), and 10 specimens came from central-southern part of
the Czech Republic (snowy winter, mild summer, humid habitat and limited supple mentary feeding). After measuring whole-antler parameters, a destructive sampling
was performed to obtain a full-transversal section and cortical bone samples from
two sampling position along the main beam. Then bone structure, mechanical proper ties (three-point bending test, impact test) and the mineral profile were studied. Roe
deer from Spain had heavier and longer antlers than Czech roe deer. Their bone
material had a higher mechanical quality, although Czech roe deer compensated by
developing antlers with thicker walls. Mineral composition also differs, particularly
by greater contents in Czech antlers in 3 minerals associated with nutrient stress: Fe,
K and Zn. We concluded that the differences found between populations may be
caused by differences in habitat quality and diet, in a similar way as reported for red
deer, despite interspecific differences. Our study suggests that habitat affects antler
parameters and, as previous results in red deer, suggests that improving diet quality
may affect size, composition and mechanical quality of antler material. Certainly,
antlers of roe deer provide information useful for population management